The Baha'i Faith

Unveiling the Truth: Behind the Public Image of the Baha'i Faith

The hoops Haifan Baha'is jump through to try to say Bahaullah created the concept of the UHJ



Bahá’u’lláh conferred authority upon the Universal House of Justice to exert a positive influence on the welfare of humankind, to promote education, peace and global prosperity, and to safeguard human honour and the position of religion.

https://universalhouseofjustice.bahai.org/

Where does Baha'u'llah say this? In the Kitab i Aqdas, where Baha'u'llah writes about the "House of Justice" (not "Universal House of Justice"), and says the House of Justice is something to be built "in every city", and never describes any kind of global religious institution? Oh, but Abdul Baha "interpreted" Baha'u'llah's writings, which never refer to a UHJ, to refer to a UHJ, using his "infallible interpretive authority" which Baha'u'llah never gave him, but which he has because reasons, so we must ignore what Baha'u'llah's writings say and go with Abdul Baha's "infallible interpretation".

Imagine if Baha'is had not believed in this lie of the UHJ. Imagine if Baha'is had built local Houses of Justice, as Bahaullah intended. Imagine if every local Baha'i community had its own identity, instead of every single one unanimously revolving around the Institute Process.

The Baha'i Leadership's Role in the Displacement of Palestinians



The Baha'i community's actions in relation to land acquisitions and dealings with the Israeli government paint a picture of questionable practices, often driven by opportunism and a willingness to negotiate with forces that have historically oppressed and displaced Palestinian people. What follows is an unflinching examination of the Baha’i leadership’s actions concerning land dealings, the sale of Palestinian villages, and the purchasing of Palestinian, Arab and Muslim properties from the Israeli government, all of which exposes the community’s ethical standing.

1. Sale of Palestinian Villages to Zionists

In the 1920s, Shoghi Effendi, took part in selling entire Palestinian villages - specifically, the villages of al-Nuqayb and al-Samra - to the Jewish National Fund (JNF). These lands were owned by the Baha'is but had originally been inhabited by Palestinian Arabs. Shoghi Effendi's decision to sell these lands to the JNF, a Zionist organization, enabled the expansion of Jewish settlements and further entrenched the displacement of Palestinians. The eventual depopulation of the village of al-Samra in 1948 following the sale epitomizes the destructive consequences of these transactions. The Baha'i leadership thus played a pivotal role in facilitating the very forces that would later lead to the Nakba (the Palestinian exodus). This sale was not just an economic transaction; it was an act that compounded the suffering of displaced Palestinians.

2. Purchase of the Mansion of Bahji from the Israeli Government

The acquisition of the Mansion of Bahji, along with its surrounding lands, occurred after the original Arab owners fled during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. The land was later obtained by Shoghi Effendi through an exchange with the Israeli government. While the Baha'i leadership frames this acquisition as necessary for preserving the faith’s holy sites, the fact remains that it was made possible only by exploiting the flight of Palestinian Arabs. This exchange not only benefited the Baha'i Faith but also served as yet another instance of the Israeli government capitalizing on the land vacated by Palestinians.

3. The Case of Mazra'ih

Mazra'ih, a Muslim religious endowment (waqf), was sold to the Baha'is under controversial circumstances. Despite waqf properties being legally protected from sale under Islamic law, the Israeli Minister of Religions, Rabbi Maimon, intervened to allow the Baha'is to take control of Mazra'ih, effectively violating Islamic law. This land, originally held by Palestinian Muslims, was appropriated with direct assistance from the Israeli government. The acquisition of Mazra'ih, a Waqf property of Muslims, was not merely an administrative transaction - it was an example of religious and nationalistic manipulation for the benefit of the Baha'i community, furthering Israel’s goal of consolidating control over Palestinian land.

4. Exchanges with the Israeli Military

There is also evidence of the Baha'i leadership engaging in land exchanges with the Israeli military. One notable transaction involved the property that was initially held by the British War Office and later transferred to the Carmelites. This property was ultimately transferred to Shoghi Effendi’s name in a deal involving the Israeli Defense Ministry. Such dealings reflect the Baha'i leadership’s complicity in negotiating with military authorities whose actions have historically been associated with the subjugation of Palestinians. These exchanges were not merely bureaucratic; they were strategic, ensuring the Baha'i community’s continued safety and protection in Palestine at the expense of displaced Palestinians.

5. Using Demolished Palestinian Homes for Shrines

One of the most disturbing aspects of the Baha'i community’s dealings in Israel relates to the use of ceramic tiles taken from demolished Palestinian homes, primarily in Yafo (Jaffa). These tiles were used in the construction around the Shrines of Baha'u'llah and the Bab. By collecting and hauling away remnants of Palestinian homes, the Baha'is not only benefitted from the destruction of Palestinian properties but actively engaged in the symbolic erasure of Palestinian history and culture. The act of using these tiles to decorate their shrines illustrates an insensitivity to the trauma of Palestinians whose homes were destroyed, and whose lives were upended by the expansion of Zionist settlements.

6. Buying Lands owned by "Covenant-Breakers"

The Baha’i community also engaged in buying land that had once been owned by individuals labeled as "covenant-breakers" - those who had fallen out of favor with the Baha’i leadership. Many of these individuals were either displaced or had their lands appropriated by the Israeli government after fleeing the newly established state. Shoghi Effendi’s decision to purchase land from the Israeli government, which had taken control of such properties, highlights the opportunistic nature of these acquisitions. This was not merely a religious dispute within the Baha'i community; it was a matter of exploiting the situation in a post-1948 Palestine, where the Israeli government controlled vast swaths of Palestinian land.

7. Purification of the Haram-i-Aqdas

Another contentious action was the exhumation and reburial of Diya'u'llah, the younger brother of Abdul Baha, from the Haram-i-Aqdas near the Shrine of Baha'u'llah in Bahji. The Baha'is justified this act as a necessary "purification" of the sacred site, which had been tainted by the presence of those they considered covenant-breakers. This operation, which included expropriation orders from the Israeli government, involved the removal of remains and the expulsion of individuals associated with the early Baha’i schisms. It was a harsh, legalistic cleansing, carried out with the complicity of Israeli authorities, which further entrenched the Baha’i community’s ties to the Israeli state.

8. Negotiation for the Temple Site on Mount Carmel

The land where the Baha'i Temple will come in the future on Mount Carmel was initially coveted by the British military but later transferred to the Israeli Defense Ministry. The Baha'i leadership successfully negotiated with Israeli authorities to secure this land for their holy site. This further solidified the Baha'i community’s relationship with the Israeli military and government, ensuring their position in a region that had seen the violent displacement of its Palestinian population. By obtaining land originally sought after by foreign powers and later secured by Israel, the Baha'is once again benefitted from the dispossession of Palestinians.

9. The Zikrullah Property

Finally, the Baha’i community's exchange of land near Galilee (Zikrullah property) for land near the Shrine of Baha'u'llah from the Israeli government again highlights their active engagement in land transactions with Israel. The Zikrullah property, located near the border of Syria and within a demilitarized zone, was an area of interest for the Israeli government, which pressured the Zikrullah family to sell. The Baha’is, however, negotiated a trade for land that had been expropriated from Palestinians, thus further enriching the Baha'i community at the expense of the Palestinian people.

A History of Opportunism and Complicity

The Baha'i community's dealings with the Israeli government are a deeply troubling aspect of their history. From selling Palestinian villages to purchasing land taken from displaced Palestinians, from exploiting demolished Palestinian homes to negotiating with military authorities, the Baha'i leadership’s actions consistently reveal a pattern of opportunism and complicity in the dispossession of Palestinian land. Rather than standing in solidarity with the oppressed, the Baha'is chose to align themselves with the very forces responsible for the displacement and suffering of millions of Palestinians. These actions expose the darker side of the Baha'i Faith’s relationship with Israel and its role in the ongoing injustice faced by the Palestinian people.

Bahá'ís are complicit in genocide


This will be uncomfortable for many Bahá’ís... especially those with truly good hearts. But neutrality and silence in the face of injustice support tyranny. Of all people, Bahá’ís should know this.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cde3eyzdr63o

In what kind of world can one preach justice and claim to stand for truth, while remaining silent about the slaughter of children just a few miles away? Shame on those who defend such hypocrisy.

There are many kind-hearted Bahá’ís who feel a deep unease about this... and they should. That discomfort is not weakness. It is your conscience. It is reason, trying to speak the truth.

You cannot, on one hand, denounce the atrocities in Iran, and on the other, turn away from genocide unfolding right before your eyes. That contradiction is not neutrality. It is hypocrisy. And those who numb the hearts of the kind and the compassionate should be ashamed.

Singing 'Kumbaya' in circles, quoting scripture, and exchanging emails from within ivory towers, while children are being butchered outside your door , is this what truth looks like?

If you claim to belong to the 'Holy Land', then the suffering in that land is your problem too. Just as you speak out for justice in Iran, in Ukraine, or anywhere else , you must speak out here as well. Anything less is complicity.

Bahá’ís are fortunate, most of the world barely knows who they are. They live safely in a comfortable bubble, untouched by scrutiny. But never before has the world been so united in its moral outrage and those who speak of 'unity' day and night are choosing, willfully, to remain outside of it.

Go test it for yourself. I dare you to bring up this issue with your Local Spiritual Assembly. Watch the reactions. Witness the hypocrisy.

Here is a heroine , one of your own, who stood up for justice. And what became of her? She was cast out. Banished from your circle. Thrown out of the very community she tried to hold accountable.....

Baha'is converting children of other religions through Baha'i Children Classes. Here is the proof.

Baháʼu'lláh is introduced to children through these songs primarily as the Prophet of God for today and the Promised One of all ages, who brought a message of unity, justice, and love for all mankind, despite enduring great suffering.

Here are some short examples from the songs:

  • The Promised One and Glory of God: Songs directly identify him as "Bahá’u’lláh, the Glory of God" and "The Promised One of All the Ages". For example, "Sing a new song, the Promised One has come / Sing a new song, Bahá’u’lláh has come".
  • Bringer of a New Day and Unity: He is presented as having "Came to bring a new Day / Of harmony and unity" and "told us of the new way / That all men should live as one". Another song states, "In this Day Bahá’u’lláh / Talkin’ to the world about justice" and "about oneness".
  • Sufferer for Humanity: Children learn about his imprisonment and exile. For instance, he was "enchained and imprisoned Him / In a dungeon cold and black" and endured "banishment and exile" to "set us free". The song "The Shores of ‘Akká" recounts him as "The Peerless One" and "the prisoners called Him their Lord" enduring "great hardships" and "four and twenty years" in "the Most Great Prison".
  • Source of Peace and Love: He is called "The Prince of Peace" and is credited with bringing "love and peace of mind" and showing that "justice was best in His sight".
  • Personal Connection and Commitment: Children are encouraged to have a personal connection, as in "I have found Bahá’u’lláh / In the early days of my life / I will keep Him in my heart / And stay with Him forever". They are also asked, "Will you give your life to Bahá’u’lláh" and to "give your heart" to him.
  • Central Figure of a New Age: The songs herald his coming as the dawn of a "new Day" and a "new golden Age," fulfilling God's promises to mankind.

These classes are described as gatherings where children aged 5-12 learn spiritual qualities and virtues through stories, songs, games, and crafts!

But that's not the case. These children are brainwashed to believe that Baha'u'llah is superior to all other prophets and he is the manifestation of God for this age. While one of his "Tablet" explicitly states that he supplied women to his brother, Subḥ-i-Azal.

Specifically, Bahā’u’llāh recounts that after he and his brother arrived in Iraq, Subḥ-i-Azal sought a wife from him. Bahā’u’llāh states that he "procured for him what quelled his carnal desire, and he dwelled comfortably in the land". He further details that he "sent for believing women to be dispatched from other lands to appear before thee," after which his brother "didst enjoy intimacy with them and abide in conspicuous comfort". Bahā’u’llāh also mentions that his brother continued to seek gratification for his passion, eventually "gather[ing] around thyself a number of maidens and sustain[ing] thyself with them".

Source - Adib Masumian's website : https://adibmasumian.com/translations/lawh-i-mirza-rida-quli

Bahā’u’llāh thus Pimped out believing women to his brother and gave women from his cult to his brother.

More videos to see how Baha'is teach their religion to innocent children of other religions:

19 reasons to hate Baha'u'llah

  1. He hijacked the Báb’s movement.
    He dumped the rightful successor of the Báb and hijacked the whole movement for himself like a power-hungry opportunist.
  2. He was abusive, foul-mouthed, and dangerous.
    This guy was a narcissist and a compulsive liar with a God complex. He cursed people out, abused Muslims, and even ordered hits on those who challenged him like the Azalis.
  3. He lived like royalty but cried “prisoner.”
    While whining about being a “prisoner,” he lived in giant mansions with private gardens—one had around 30 rooms! Pure hypocrisy.
  4. He claimed to be God.
    He didn’t just claim divine inspiration—he straight-up said there is no God but him. Full-blown delusion.
  5. Failed family man with multiple wives.
    He married at least three times and completely failed at raising his kids. After he died, they went to war with each other—cursing and slandering like enemies.
  6. His family was a disaster.
    The so-called “holy family” was the most fractured, toxic, and disunited mess imaginable.
  7. Pretended to be Muslim his whole life.
    He kept up the act till the end—posing as a Muslim, performing Saum and Salah, and even getting buried the Muslim way. Fake to the core.
  8. Faked divine knowledge.
    He studied Arabic, trained with Sufis, and had a big personal library—but had the nerve to claim his knowledge was “innate” and “divine.” Give me a break.
  9. Ran away and left his family behind.
    When things got rough, he bailed. Fled to the mountains and left the women in his family to fend for themselves.
  10. His cult contributed nothing to the world.
    His entire so-called religion gave zero value to humanity. Just empty words and cultish nonsense.
  11. Started his movement after an erotic hallucination.
    He kicked off his “divine mission” after what sounds like a spiritualized wet dream about a “maiden of heaven.” Total creep vibes.
  12. Let people worship him.
    His followers bowed to him, walked around him like he was the Kaaba, and he just soaked it up like a wannabe god.
  13. Pimped out “believing women” to his brother.
    Yeah, he gave women from his cult to his brother. That’s not just twisted—it’s predatory.
  14. Wrote long-winded trash.
    His writings are bloated with over-the-top hype and barely any real meaning. All noise, no depth.
  15. Polluted a river with his garbage writings.
    He dumped thousands of his own writings into the Tigris River. People say the water actually changed color from the mess.
  16. Let people kiss his hands and feet.
    He acted like a king, letting followers kiss his hands and feet—then called them “servants of God.” What a joke.
  17. Claimed to be God but begged colonial powers for help.
    He preached he was divine, yet ran to imperialists and even The Times newspaper, begging for backup. So much for being all-powerful.
  18. Wrote a law book full of holes.
    His so-called “book of laws” is a contradictory mess—flawed, inconsistent, and practically unusable.
  19. Talked about religious unity while cursing everyone else.
    He preached unity, but anyone who didn’t worship him was called an infidel, a polytheist, or worse. Classic cult hypocrisy.


The Role of Qurrat al-‘Ayn in the Bábí Movement: An Iranian Historical Perspective



Declaration of the Abrogation of Islam and the Period of Interregnum :

The ruling of the abrogation of Islam and its declaration — the command to annul religion and enter the interregnum (i.e., a period free from religious laws and obligations) — can, both essentially and in specific instances, be attributed to the leader of Bábism himself. At one point, in the Tafsír Súrat Yúsuf, he wrote to Qurrat al-‘Ayn:

"O Qurrat al-‘Ayn! It is now permitted for women to wear silk garments like the houris of paradise, to adorn themselves and emerge from their homes in the appearance of heavenly maidens, to sit unveiled among men and on benches…" (The Báb).

However, in the well-known and widely accepted event among the Bábís and Bahá’ís — the incident of the village of Badasht near Shahrud, led by Qurrat al-‘Ayn with the cooperation and preparation of Husayn-‘Alí (Bahá’u’lláh) and Muhammad-‘Alí Bārfurúsh — she publicly declared the abrogation of Islamic law. This unsuccessful foundation of religious destruction and superstition left a legacy in the belief systems of the Bábís and later the Bahá’ís.

Even before these declarations, in Badasht itself, approximately 82 Bábís had gathered to discuss how to rescue the Primal Point (the Báb) from prison, as well as to debate religious obligations and whether the Islamic laws would change or not. During that time, led in prayer by Mírzá Husayn-‘Alí, they still performed Islamic prayers (Zāhed, p. 184).

After private, day-and-night meetings among the three leaders, Qurrat al-‘Ayn ultimately became the medium or leader of this strange ideological shift. That day, she appeared bare-headed, wearing elegant clothes and makeup, and sat initially behind a curtain. She declared:

"O companions! This era is considered a period of interregnum. Today, all religious duties are abolished at once — fasting and prayer are vain acts. When Mírzá ‘Alí Muhammad Báb conquers the seven climes and unifies all religions, then he will bring forth a new religious law and entrust his own Qur’án to the people. Every obligation he introduces anew will become mandatory for all people on earth. Therefore, do not impose unnecessary burdens upon yourselves. Let your women share in your intimacy; share your possessions with one another. There will be no punishment or torment for these acts." (Najafí, p. 524).

In another account from Miftāḥ Bāb al-Abwāb (or The History of the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh), whose author’s father and grandfather had met the Báb before his execution in Tabriz and witnessed some Bábí events, it is narrated that she said:

"O beloved ones, listen; O strangers, know this: The laws of the Muhammadan Sharia have now been abrogated due to the appearance of the Báb. The laws of the new Bábí Sharia have not yet reached us, so your engagement with prayer, fasting, zakát, and all other teachings of Muhammad (peace be upon him) are now null acts, done only by the heedless and the ignorant. Soon, our Master, the Báb, will conquer all lands; he will subjugate the people; soon the seven populated regions of the earth will submit to him, and he will unify all existing religions so that no religion remains on earth except the new true faith of the Báb, of which we have received but a small portion. Therefore, I tell you — and my word is truth — there is no command or prohibition, no obligation or restriction. We are now in the time of interregnum. So, come forth from isolation into unity, tear away the veil that prevents you from enjoying your women. Involve them in your affairs, divide your tasks with them after you have had your fill of pleasure with them. Be intimate with them. Bring them from their homes into public gatherings. Women are the flowers of this worldly life. A flower must be plucked and smelled, for it is created to be picked and enjoyed. Do not leave them untouched or unattended — smell them with full delight. Flowers and blossoms are to be picked and gifted to friends.

The concentration of wealth among some and the deprivation of others is the root of all strife and corruption; for wealth was not created for one person to enjoy alone while others are deprived of it. Rather, property is a shared right of all people, and no one has portioned it out. Wealth should be held in common, circulated among all. No one should hoard it or claim exclusive ownership. Some people should share their wealth with others to eliminate poverty and hardship, and to lift the burden of livelihood. Do not withhold your women from your friends, for now there is no deterrent, no boundary, no law or obligation. No one can prevent anyone. So, take your share of pleasure and life, for after death there is nothing." (Za‘ím al-Dawlah, pp. 133–134).

It remains unclear — if a true interregnum was indeed declared and no laws or obligations exist — on what basis Qurrat al-‘Ayn gives these financial "dos and don’ts" to the Bábís (which, in any case, are not novel ideas). She had previously visited Husayn-‘Alí unveiled in Badasht, and the rationale offered was based on the Qur’anic phrase "ghaddū absārakum" (“lower your gaze”), which Mírzá Áqá Ján explains in Talkhís-i-Tāríkh-i-Nabíl as follows:

"On the Day of Resurrection, the noble Táhirih will appear unveiled and radiant before the people; at that moment, a voice from the unseen will proclaim, ‘Lower your gaze!’ — and all the companions will be struck with dread and dismay." (Zarandí, pp. 474, 476).

Muṣṭafawī interprets the implications and meanings as:

  1. The plain of Badasht is the Resurrection.

  2. Táhirih Qurrat al-‘Ayn Qazvīnī is equivalent to Fāṭimah al-Zahrā.

  3. Fāṭimah al-Zahrā — the embodiment of chastity and modesty, the symbol of piety and purity — appeared at Badasht, unveiled and adorned, in the form of Táhirih (Muṣṭafawī, p. 142).

With such groundwork laid, when Qurrat al-‘Ayn concluded her speech at Badasht, she drew back the curtain, and for the first time, the Bábís there saw her fully adorned.

In Az Ṣabā tā Nīmā, she is introduced as the first woman who, contrary to the customs and traditions of the time, appeared unveiled before men (Ārīanpūr, p. 131).

The consequence of Táhirih’s doctrinal innovation cannot be underestimated. In these very words, she made astonishing claims. According to her, ‘Alí Muhammad would eventually conquer the seven climes and unify all religions. But how have the Bábís and Bahá’ís recorded this in their sources when, in fact, ‘Alí Muhammad was executed within just six years of his claim, having conquered no lands and established no unified faith on earth — and he and Qurrat al-‘Ayn never even met? If there were any truth to this claim, perhaps her other claims — such as the doctrine of interregnum and renunciation of Islam — might be considered.

Qurrat al-‘Ayn, possessing some knowledge of religious sciences and at times conducting sermons and proselytizing gatherings for Bábism, denied Prophethood's finality, declared the Qur’án abrogated, and proclaimed ‘Alí Muhammad a prophet after the Prophet — separating his followers theologically from Muslims and Shí‘a. These destructive effects essentially go back to ‘Alí Muhammad and his inciters, including colonial conspirators and their financial backers. However, ‘Alí Muhammad had not yet openly declared such claims, and until then, his legitimacy was tied to being a deputy of the Hidden Imam. So, as this sect separated from Islamic faith and thought — led by Qurrat al-‘Ayn — many people abandoned it (Zāhed, p. 187).

Thus, among Qurrat al-‘Ayn’s other impacts was the departure of many Bábís from the sect and a decrease in the followers of ‘Alí Muhammad. Some, however, believed her instantly or were pleased with irreligion, and pursued freedom from religious constraints, committing various transgressions — until the residents of Badasht, disgusted by the vile state of affairs, attacked them by night (I‘tizād al-Dawlah, p. 143).

The establishment and public declaration of the abrogation of Islam, in the eyes of those who followed the Báb out of personal interest or fancy, permanently separated this sect from the Islamic community. Later, the Bahá’ís, under the leadership of Bahá’u’lláh, who claimed divinity and brought a religion newer than that of the Báb, continued this path — followed by his children, the Afnáns and the Aghṣáns, all the way to Shoghi Effendi and the Rúḥíyyih Khánum. Today, this sect, centered around the Universal House of Justice, uses the common property of the Bahá’ís — though most Bahá’ís remain unaware of these religious annulments, new laws, sectarianism, and the self-serving motives of some early Bábí and Bahá’í leaders and their foreign backers.

Declaring Shí‘a Scholars Worthy of Death:

One of Qurrat al-‘Ayn’s most influential ideas in the sect was her enmity toward Shí‘a scholars and mujtahids, declaring them worthy of death. This notion significantly influenced how most Bábís viewed scholars. Initially, Bábís avoided such conflicts with the ‘ulamā. Of course, opposition and excommunication from scholars had existed since Shaykh Aḥmad Aḥsā’ī, and this unintentionally sustained Bábism — but the foundation of ideological conflict and the killing of scholars can be traced to Qurrat al-‘Ayn’s teachings.

One such scholar was Mullā Muhammad Taqī Baraghānī Qazvīnī, Qurrat al-‘Ayn’s uncle and the marja‘ al-taqlīd of his time in Qazvīn — a man who, with foresight, from the outset opposed the ideological foundation of Bábism (i.e., certain strange beliefs of Shaykh Aḥmad Aḥsā’ī and Sayyid Kāẓim Rashtī). He openly disagreed with Shaykh Aḥmad and declared the Bábís infidels.

Mullā Muhammad Taqī led Friday prayers in Qazvīn. Many scholars and students attended his sermons and recorded his notes. His worship routine involved praying in his mosque from midnight until dawn in supplication and devotion.

A man named Mírzā Jawād, an Arab originally from Qazvīn, said:

A few days before his martyrdom, I visited him. He said, "Pray for me." I said, "God has already granted you all the blessings of this world and the next — honor, wealth, children, knowledge, propagation of religion, authorship. What more do you desire?" He replied, "My desire is martyrdom." I said, "You’ve always strived for martyrdom — for, according to hadith, the ink of scholars is more valuable than the blood of martyrs." He said, "Yes, but I seek martyrdom in the literal sense — to be soaked in blood…"
(Tankābunī, 1380: pp. 67–68).

Qurrat al-‘Ayn assumed ideological leadership of a Bábí faction so that this wish of Mullā Muhammad Taqī would be fulfilled. Their justification for his murder was a fabricated hadith:

"Whoever insults our pure Shí‘a (including Shaykh Aḥmad Aḥsā’ī) has insulted the Prophet himself — and whoever insults the Prophet is an infidel, impure, and their blood is licit."
(Nūr Muḥammadī, 1381: p. 100).

Not only did she issue the fatwa for his death, but also planned its execution and the aftermath. She dismissed a group of Arabs who had accompanied her to Qazvīn, and when one asked, “Why are Shaykh Ṣāliḥ and Mullā Ibrāhīm not coming?” she replied, “They stayed behind for an important matter. Soon, there will be an uproar in this city, and I don’t want you to be here then” (Najafí, p. 517).


The tragedy of Qurrat al-‘Ayn and her companions lies in the fact that they didn’t kill him face-to-face, but rather while the elderly man was in prostration and worship — not giving him a chance to fight or even to respond.

One night, as usual, Mullā Muhammad Taqī went to the mosque in the middle of the night. While in prostration, reading Munājāt-i-Khamsa-‘Ashar with deep humility and tears, several Bábís entered the mosque. One first stabbed his neck — he did not react. On the second wound, he lifted his head and asked, “Why are you killing me?” In response — displaying the height of Bábí "logic" — they stabbed his mouth, tearing it open.

He rose from the prayer niche to avoid spilling blood in the mosque, but collapsed near the door, unconscious in a pool of his own blood. He lived for two more days, unable to speak due to his wounded mouth, suffering great thirst yet unable to drink. He continually recalled the thirst of Imām Ḥusayn (peace be upon him), weeping and saying:

"O Abā ‘Abdillāh! May my soul be your ransom! What did you endure from thirst?"
(Tankābunī, p. 68).

He was later named "the Third Martyr," as years after his death, his body was found intact (Nūr Muḥammadī, p. 102).

He authored numerous scholarly works. Shaykh Ḥasan Najafí (author of Jawāhir al-Kalām) drew from his book Manhaj al-Ijtihād. He also wrote ‘Ayn al-Uṣūl in two volumes, treatises on judgment, superior prayers, purification, fasting, and a book titled Majālis al-Muttaqīn, consisting of fifty sermons. He had ten sons — seven were mujtahids and three near that level. In 1304 AH, upon the introduction of national identity registration, the family took the surname Shahídī (Nūr Muḥammadī, p. 103).

Qurrat al-‘Ayn’s Practical Impact in Bábism:

Through her religious knowledge inherited from her scholarly family and her eloquence, Qurrat al-‘Ayn fervently promoted Bábism. The conflict between the Bábís and the forces of Amir Kabir in the region of Mazandaran near the shrine of Shaykh Ṭabarsí lasted four months and resulted in many deaths. The seditions and fanaticism of the Bábís — especially the prominent role of Qurrat al-‘Ayn — were among the primary causes of the Báb’s execution. They had no hesitation in plotting the assassination of opponents while spreading their faith.

Their fanaticism and "self-sacrifice" in spreading the new religion only increased — especially when they saw Amir Kabir as an obstacle to their advancement…

Wikipedia and the Baha’i Faith: A Closer Look

 


Wikipedia, one of the world’s top 15 websites, gets around 1.7 billion visitors each month. It runs on the contributions of over 200,000 volunteer editors and more than 3,000 administrators who help maintain order, resolve disputes, and enforce rules. Community-elected panels handle complaints and conflicts to ensure a healthy and safe environment for all participants.

To support this goal, Wikipedia has a universal Code of Conduct. This code sets standards for behavior, aiming to prevent harassment, abuse of power, and manipulation of information.

Concerns About Baha’i Editors on Wikipedia

Given Wikipedia’s massive reach, many groups recognize its influence. The Baha’i Administration is one such group. Aware of the platform’s power, they have trained members to actively edit and monitor Wikipedia pages related to the Baha’i Faith. These editors, work to ensure that content aligns with the official stance of the Baha’i Administrative Order.

According to several observers, these editors often remove or censor content that criticizes the Baha’i Faith, regardless of whether it comes from published, credible sources. They also manipulate demographic data to inflate the global Baha’i population and suppress alternative viewpoints.

Disputed Population Figures

One recurring issue is the exaggeration of Baha’i population numbers. For instance, the Wikipedia page on Baha’is in the United States lists five different figures, ranging from 77,000 to 4.5 million. This wide range raises questions about accuracy and consistency. The only reliable source should be the official U.S. Census, yet this is often ignored.

Some groups, like ARDA and adherents.com, along with WCE editors—most probably in contact with the Baha’i community—are providing inflated and inconsistent statistics. Recently, the Universal House of Justice (UHJ) revised its global Baha’i population figure from 7 million to 5 million. Country-wise breakdown, could reveal that many listed as Baha’is are "paper members" with little or no actual involvement in the faith.

Suppressing Other Sects

There are nine active Baha’i sects, yet information about these groups is tightly controlled by editors linked to the Baha’i administration. Even though the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against the Baha’i Administrative Order in the past, Wikipedia pages continue to reflect only one narrative. Alternative perspectives, even when backed by reputable sources, are often dismissed as unreliable or removed entirely.

These editors reject anything that doesn't align with the official narrative—even if it comes from a respected author or a neutral academic source. On the other hand, publications by Baha’i-affiliated authors are treated as unquestionably reliable!

A Narrative of Persecution

A major theme across Baha’i-related Wikipedia pages is persecution, particularly in Iran. While this is a real and serious issue, it is no doubt overemphasized, sometimes even included on pages unrelated to Iran. Baha’is believe this focus serves to draw sympathy and overshadow critical perspectives.

Training Editors to Shape the Narrative

Baha’i editors are trained by the BIA to manage Wikipedia content, suppress opposing views, and promote the official version of Baha’i beliefs and history. With Wikipedia being such a powerful information source, shaping public perception through it has become a strategic priority.

An Appeal to Wikipedia and the Public

I urge Wikipedia administrators to investigate the editing history of specific editors—such as Smkolins, Cunado, Dragfyre, and Tarikhijtemai. Look into how many times they have reversed edits, ignored consensus, or bypassed dispute resolution processes. If these concerns are validated, appropriate action, including bans or restrictions, should be considered. It’s also crucial to check if any have gained undue influence within Wikipedia’s administrative ranks.

To the general public: Please approach Baha’i-related Wikipedia pages with caution. Much of the content is biased, misleading, incorrect or incomplete. For a balanced view, explore a variety of sources beyond Wikipedia to understand the Baha’i Faith and its practices.

To the Universal House of Justice: Coordinated editing efforts may have worked in the past, but they are now being noticed. Instead of helping, this strategy could accelerate a decline in public trust.

Final Thoughts

Author Vernon Johnson, in his recent book Baha’is in Exile, puts it succinctly:

“A religion fearful of the facts, that has to obstruct or control them in some way, is either a false religion or an immature one. ”

A faith that hides behind edited narratives risks becoming a story, not a truth.

"Mother of All Evil" by Zohreh Davoudi


Mother of All Evil is a powerful and deeply personal book written by Zohreh Davoudi, the daughter of Dr. Ali Morad Davoudi, who was the secretary of Iran’s first National Security Agency just before the 1979 revolution. Through her eyes, we are given a raw and unfiltered look into the private life of a man who held an important public role—but behind closed doors, was a very different person.

Zohreh grew up in a well-known Baha’i family in Tehran during the time of the Shah. Her father, Ali Morad, was not only a respected Baha’i philosopher but also a man who held immense power. Despite their religious beliefs that promoted peace and equality, Zohreh paints a picture of a home filled with fear, violence, and abuse.

Zohreh’s family background is deeply rooted in Iranian royalty. Her grandmother was a Qajar princess named Belgheys, a descendant of Fath Ali Shah, and her great-grandfather was once the governor of Georgia. This rich heritage, however, did little to protect her from the horrors she experienced as a child.

Zohreh shares painful memories of her father’s brutal punishments—being beaten with a belt at the age of eight, simply for reciting poetry. She also reveals heartbreaking moments of being molested by her uncle Iranfar, another member of the Baha’i community, after being punished by her father. These were not isolated incidents, but repeated traumas that shaped her childhood.

Her mother, much younger than her father when they married, also suffered greatly. Zohreh recalls scenes where her father dragged her mother into the courtyard, humiliated her, and controlled her harshly. He treated his elder daughter, Ladan, just as cruelly—dragging her by her hair and screaming threats for not standing when he entered the room.

The book also explores the hypocrisy Zohreh saw within the Baha’i community. While the faith claimed to support gender equality and had removed traditional dowries (mehriyah), her mother still demanded material gifts from suitors to secure Zohreh’s future, treating marriage more like a business deal than a union based on love.

In a particularly haunting part of the book, Zohreh recounts her pilgrimage to Haifa, where she laughed in the shrine, roamed the streets of Tel Aviv, and called herself names like “the poison of a snake” and “a fatherless whore.” These words reflect her deep emotional wounds and struggle for identity.

The story takes a mysterious and tragic turn when, shortly after the Iranian Revolution, her father disappeared during a morning walk in Queen Farah Park on November 11, 1979. He was never seen again.

Detailed review by Alison Marshall can be read here:

https://alisonelizabethmarshall.com/book-review-mother-of-all-evil-by-zohreh-davoudi/

Authorship of "A Traveller's Narrative"?


Does anyone know if there is a reason to believe Abdul Baha wrote A Traveller's Narrative, other than a hunch by E.G. Browne?

I asked ChatGPT 'When was it first claimed that "A Traveller's Narrative" was written by Abdul Baha?' and it responded with the following:

The claim that A Traveller’s Narrative (Maqālah-yi Shakhṣī Sayyāḥ) was authored by `Abdu’l-Bahá was first made public in the English-speaking world in 1891, when Edward Granville Browne published his English translation alongside the Persian original in Cambridge.

In the introduction to his publication, Browne carefully avoids directly naming the author but includes strong hints, stating that the author was “a well-known personage in the Bábí community.” Later, in his personal correspondence and subsequent writings, Browne makes it clearer that he believed `Abdu’l-Bahá to be the author.

The Bahá’í community itself did not openly acknowledge Abdu’l-Bahá’s authorship at the time, likely due to the political sensitivity of the content andAbdu’l-Bahá's vulnerable position in Ottoman Palestine. It was only decades later, especially after `Abdu’l-Bahá’s passing and the relative stabilization of the Faith’s political situation, that his authorship became widely affirmed within the Bahá’í community.

So in summary:

  • First public implication of `Abdu’l-Bahá’s authorship: 1891 (by E.G. Browne).
  • Widespread acknowledgment within the Bahá’í community: gradually, especially after `Abdu’l-Bahá’s death in 1921.

Does anyone have proof that it was written by Abdul Baha?


Source : https://www.reddit.com/r/FreeSpeechBahai/comments/1k4qr3n/authorship_of_a_travellers_narrative/

Baha'i Population Statistics in South Carolina Exposed.

From article written by probable Baha'i which uses likely more recent official Baha'i sources:

"The lack of consolidation means that as in 2017, only 4,500 Baha'is have their correct addresses in the Baha'i database."

https://www.worldreligionnews.com/religion-news/surprise-2nd-popular-religion-south-carolina-bahai-faith/?amp=1

The Muslim population in South Carolina is 6,677:

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/muslim-population-by-state

The Jewish population is 36,210:

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-population-in-the-united-states-by-state

So there are more Muslims in South Carolina than Baha'is, and more Jews in South Carolina than Baha'is.